XUL Interface

Bug report and feature request
Post Reply
User avatar
thibeaz
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 2:17 am

XUL Interface

Post by thibeaz » Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:19 pm

Just a suggestion I think mediacoder could benefit from changing the current gui into a XUL based gui. one user in paticular seemed to have a bug in his mediacoder (Can't say what version/Build) but it would hopefully bring an end to the need of using firefox as it could use gecko as it's engine for settings and what not ;)

(Don't shoot the messenger this is only a suggestion)

stanley
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4135
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:43 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by stanley » Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:50 am

It's my plan to write the GUI from scratch based on XUL. But I'm still learn about XUL in the progress of improving XULPlayer. Once I'm ready or someone wants to offer me help, I will do it.
I think the native GUI should still be kept as an option, as some users will prefer it as it consumes less memory.
When things work together, things work.

User avatar
thibeaz
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 2:17 am

Post by thibeaz » Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:36 am

Not only that it may eliminate some of the need for firefox

stanley
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4135
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:43 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by stanley » Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:56 pm

XUL-based application depends on XULRunner, which is almost the foundation of Firefox.
When things work together, things work.

User avatar
thibeaz
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 2:17 am

Post by thibeaz » Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:33 pm

uhmm thats not what I was talking about Stan. I meant Firefox the program not XULRunner ;) I know all that. I've been playing around with firefox for some time now (and songbird too :D Great media player that looks like itunes but surfs the web too)

Post Reply