preference data cannot be loaded and Fatal Error

Discuss about generic usage of MediaCoder.

Moderator: HuggiL

Post Reply
jrexburn
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:35 am

preference data cannot be loaded and Fatal Error

Post by jrexburn » Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:40 am

I've downloaded MediaCoder 0.5.0. Full Edition, unzipped and installed. I let it install defaults but when I run it I get 'Preference data cannot be loaded'. I tried complete uninstall and boot and reinstall, same message.

Then I did complete uninstall and downloaded MediaCoder 0.5.0 Audio Edition. I unzipped and installed and tried to run, but I get 'Fatal Error'.

I am running AMD Athlon, 1 Gig Mem, Evga Nvidia 6200 LE with 256 MB on Windows 98SE.

Would love to get this working, looks so cool.

jonhnobody
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:59 pm

I had the same trouble!!

Post by jonhnobody » Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:17 pm

I had the same trouble when I installed mediacoder.
My machine is completely different from yours, but i also use the Windows SE. Maybe the problem comes from windows.
I´d like to see a solution too.

ArnoutV
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:26 am

Post by ArnoutV » Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:07 pm

I have had no problems installing and using MediaCoder on several WinXP machines.
Maybe Win98 just doesn't work and is it time to update to a more recent version of windows (it is afterall 8 years old!)

JPRuehmann
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:17 am

Post by JPRuehmann » Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:37 pm

I have the same Problem under W2K to

I think an update to XP is out of the Question, since I don´t have that much money. And I dont think that a Price of more than 100€ are OK for the MediaCoder

Till then,
Jan-Peter

stanley
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4135
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:43 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by stanley » Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:24 am

MediaCoder should be able to run on Win2k. Are you using the latest release?

guesser
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:07 am

Post by guesser » Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:47 am

This is the same problem I found before.

It gave this same message on winME.

maybe there is something it is relying on that is in XP, that everyone takes for granted

Post Reply